Whether the First Circuit Court erred when it affirmed the District Court's denial of an indigent plaintiff's (Greene's) motion to provide and pay for expert testimony in the field of industrial-organization-psychology in a civil-rights case where proof of discrimination hinges on the production of expert testimony and data

Questions Presented for Review 1. Whether the First Circuit Court erred when it affirmed the District Court’s denial of an indigent plaintiff's (Greene’s) motion to provide and pay for expert testimony in the field of industrial organizationat psychology in a civil rights case where proof of discrimination hinges on the production of expert testimony and data. 2. Whether the First Circuit Court erred when it affirmed the District Court’s denial of an indigent plaintiffs (Greene’s) motion to provide and pay for expert testimony and analysis in the field of statistics in a civil rights case where proof of discrimination hinges on the production of expert testimony and data. 3. Whether the First Circuit Court erred when it affirmed the District Court’s denial of all of Greene’s motions for discovery of facts and data concerning non-actionable events which occurred outside of the civil rights liability period of the actionable event. Il.