Whether the constitutionality of an Act of Congress was properly drawn into question

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1.) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2403(a), may apply because neither the W.D.N.Y. federal district court, nor the U.S. C.A. 2dCir. certified to the U.S. Attorney general the fact that the constitutionality of an Act of congress was drawn into question. 2.) How Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d is being violated by the state of New York, and its Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority? 3.)Why is the N.F.T.A., and ultimately the state of New York, further reverse discriminating this petitioner, (along with the taxpaying and indigent residents'.) By violating Title VI 42 U.S.C. § 2000d. As the federal and state taxpaying residents’ of the Town of Orchard Park, NY, (and collectively the residents of the Northern and Southern Most parts of suburban-rural Erie and Niagara Counties,) by not proportionately providing N.F.T.A. transportation services to th ese areas; but providing block by block bus services to the metropolitan areas of Buffalo and Niagara Falls NY? Why does the N.F.T.A., "of counsel" Wayne Gradyl, and Governor Andrew Cuomo insist that this petitioner have to walk five miles to catch a bus if missed, when the metropolitan residents’ have frequent bus service. That is appropriated in a reverse discriminatory fashion in contravention of the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 42 U.S.C. § 2000d as indicated in the first question? 4.) Why is the N.F.T.A., N.Y.S. Division of Human Rights, and state of New York violating 42 U.S.C. § 2000a1; as New York State Law states under CVR civil rights Article 4 § 40. Similar language in the statutes concurrently? 5.) Why are the state of N.Y. and N.F.T.A. violating the federal constitution's Ist Amendment Establishment Clause? By the recommendation of a roman catholic nun, sister Denise A. Roche, member of the Grey Nuns of the Sacred Heart? As it gives the people of the state of N.Y. and U.S.A. that they are individually endorsing Christianity over all other religions? 6.) Why did Erie County Supreme Court judge Frank Sedita II] deny this petitioner civil due process in his court? 7.) Why did the NYSDHR verify the complaint and not give the petitioner a "fair hearing?" Was this perpetrated so in a reverse discriminatory manner, as the Commissioner Helen Diane Foster is African American? Just as denied pe tition for SCOTUS Docket # 17-9078, regarding Buffalo City Court African American judges' Debra Givens and Ro bert T. Russell reverse discriminatory treatments regarding NY PEN Title N, Article 240 § 240.30(1). As the NYS C. A. ruled that statute unconstitutional, just like this court as further explained in June 5, 2014 New York Law Journal Column titled, "COLUMN: THE ANNOYING FIRST AMENDMENT THICKET OF AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT." Also on the website: