Does an appellate court err in dismissing an appeal because 'it lacks an arguable basis in law or fact' without first providing the petitioner an opportunity to present the basis under which they seek to appeal?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED d Does ay APPECCATE COURT FER Witten iT Dismigies Aa APPEAL, Because “1T CACKS AN ARGUABLE BASS iN LAW 08 FACT “ WITHOUT FIRST PRoWIDING THE PETITIONER AN OFPERT UNITY To PReseat Twe Basit VUDER WHicht THEY SEEK To REPEAL Tiss Sa PReste'r THE FRCTS Thay Supremt THEIR comtm * 2) DID THE APrEURTE COURT Comme te Fuetnen Error ey BEWMING A MeTion For “REConSs iDERATICNW DELETE Beni PRoVedDED Worth FPRook THAT BLL OF THE PAYSicaAC EVibemce PRESET AT TRIRL NOT ducy RECTLY CONTRADICTER THE Distaer Court's caro vecry DETERMINATION’, BUT ALLO SNowes THe? THe “VERSION “OF EVENTS AccEPTER BY THE, DisTRew Covet WAS AC JEST IMPLAGS BLE BoT s+ PORiBle, THEREBY ESTABLISHING KOT JosT A FacTUAL Basis FOR APPELC AT RENEW BUT ALSO A LEGAL Basil, TWAT OF “CusAR OR PLA ERROR REVIEW? » ‘Voes The Apreecate Court DijactssAL SF Rw APPEAL THAT sevotves THe UaiTEn STATES GaveRUMEWT, Without . Frast PReviwintG THE PETITIONER A CAANCE Te STATE THE Basis Foe, oe Te PRESET THE FACTS UNicH SUuPPOAT , UHE APPEAL POD CATE OR GIVE THE APPEARANTE of , BIAE By THE Unrteo State, Courts 7”