Why did the U.S. C.A. 2d Cir. cite the S. Ct. Case Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. (1989); when the . petitioner's in forma pauperis motion was approved under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (d)?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1.) Why did the U.S. C.A. 2d Cir. cite the S. Ct. Case Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. (1989); when the . petitioner's in forma pauperis motion was approved under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (d)? 2.) Why are 42 U.S.C. § 1983 violations’ being ignored? As the diocese of Buffalo and Erie County NY A.D.A. Dave Heraty. As petitioner and respondent were, (at the time of incidents described in SCOTUS Docket 17-9078, James Arlotta v. diocese of Buffalo et al.,) fellow parishioners' at St. Bernadettes R.C. parish. Presenting significant questions for the Lemon Kurtzman Test. 3.) Excessive entanglements’ by diocese of Buffalo and their reluctance to properly respond to service of court documents’. Why haven't their in-house or general counsel Joseph A. Stoeckl of the Bond, Schoeneck & King Law Firm properly respond to the U.S.C.A. 2d Cir. properly served document's by this in forma pauperis pro se litigant-appellant? Just like the similar behavior(s)' in SCOTUS Docket # 179078? 4.) 42 U.S.C. § 1983 being violated by a complaint submitted to the FBI on 08/30/2018, (special agent named Christine.) Why did 2 individuals on the Franklin Street side of old Erie County Hall illegally detain and search this petitioner with no probable cause or a valid search warrant? As the violation(s)' were occurring, petitioner questioned them by requesting to see their photographic government identification. Since they were wearing un-identifiable gold badges with no valid domestic "sworn" law enforcement agencies? They also illegally stole a piece of legal pad paper that was had notations on it for research purposes. The "coincidence" of this illegal activity was right after petitioner went to Erie County D.A. John Flynn's office to inquire about a telephonic message left with his office. Where petitioner, (by pure “chance,") ran into A.D.A. Dave Heraty. A public servant that's behavior was absolutely he screamed right in my face. His nose barely touching mine, him telling me to, "s top emailing my family," him referring to his college professor father. Who took the petitioner out for breakfast when he was a full time student at Hilbert College...further constituting the Excessive Entanglement of the diocese of Buffalo, (through Hilbert College,) and the blatant conflict of interests' as Dave Heraty and Orchard Park Police Lt. Joseph Ray; (respondent in SCOTUS Docket 17-90 78,) also a member of St. Bernadettes R.C. parish. Who illegally interrogated petitioner due to the false criminal reporting by parish priest Paul Dillion Seil and sacristian Marie Savage. As a retaliation for the Vatican closing the parish elementary school. Lt. Ray was discussing the school closing with this petitioner, (another clearly evident Excessive Entanglement violation of the Constiution's Establishment Clause,) during the illegal interrogation. Then he told petitioner,"You're no longer welcomed on the parish property. if you step foot on it you'll be arrested for trespassing.' The same "property" were this petitioner facilitated a Christian Mental Health Self Help Support Group. Why did they retaliate against petitioner's Christian Mental Health Self Help Support group? As he attended an Erie County Department of Mental Health-Action for Mental Health. Mental Health self help group facilitator training session and has a certificate to do so? At the same parish Chief Justice John Roberts as a child; was a student at the closed school. Where a bronze plaque commemorates his attendance there. Furthering the EXCESSIVE ENTANGLEMENT OF VIOLATIONS' OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION'S 1ST AMENDMENT ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE.