No. 18-867

Matthew E. Jackson, Jr., et al. v. Frances Edith Jackson

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2019-01-07
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Relisted (2)
Tags: civil-procedure civil-sanctions criminal-sanctions due-process eleventh-circuit equal-protection evidentiary-standards jurisdictional-limitations precedent procedural-protections sanctions supreme-court
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference: 2019-05-23 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the failure of a court to comply with the jurisdictional limitations, procedural and due process protections, evidentiary standards, the precedent set by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals and the precedent set by this Court for the issuance of either civil and criminal sanctions followed by the imposition of sanctions in amounts far in excess of and unrelated to the matters alleged to be the basis for sanctions is a violation of due process and equal protection of the law?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the failure of a court to comply with the jurisdictional limitations, procedural and due process protections, evidentiary standards, the precedent set by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals and the precedent set by this Court for the issuance of either civil and criminal sanctions followed by the imposition of sanctions in amounts far in excess of and unrelated to the matters allegec to be the basis for sanctions is a violation of due process and equal protection of the law?

Docket Entries

2019-05-28
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-05-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2019.
2019-04-12
2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2018-09-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 6, 2019)

Attorneys

Matthew Jackson, et al.
Matthew E. Jackson — Petitioner