Is the Tenth Circuit precedent allowing a district court to say nothing when a reasonable request for a variance is made at sentencing consistent with this Court's rulings in Gall and Rita, which expect a district court to engage the merits of the request so that appellate courts have the information necessary to conduct a meaningful review?

Question Presented For Review Is the Tenth Circuit precedent allowing a district court to say nothing when a reasonable request for a variance is made at sentencing consistent with this Court’s rulings in Gall and Rita, which expect a district court to engage the merits of the request so that appellate courts have the information necessary to conduct a meaningful review? i