No. 18-8676
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: counsel criminal-procedure district-court due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-review legal-remedy post-conviction-relief sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
Jurisdiction
Jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2019-04-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court violated Petitioner's Sixth Amendment rights by failing to return him to his original position absent the ineffective assistance of counsel
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED FoR REVIEW Whether the district court violated Petitioner’s Sixth Amendment rights by failing to return him to his original position absent the ineffective assistance of counsel. --prefix-
Docket Entries
2019-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.
2019-04-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-03-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 2, 2019)
Attorneys
Ronald Smith
Timothy Allen Scott — Scott Trial Lawyers, APC, Petitioner
Timothy Allen Scott — Scott Trial Lawyers, APC, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent