No. 18-8681
Jamal James Carmouche v. Jason Kent, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-conviction criminal-procedure due-process evidence-sufficiency fifth-circuit-error ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-review malicious-prosecution standard-of-review sufficiency-of-evidence trial-counsel trial-record
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference:
2019-05-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether there was sufficient evidence to convict Mr. Carmouche of a crime?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Whether there was sufficient evidence to convict Mr. Carmouche of a crime? 2. Did the Fifth Circuit err in deferring to the State Court findings that Mr. Carmouche was not prejudiced by his trial counsel’s errors when the Fifth Circuit’s decision was based on a flagrant misreading of the trial record? , 3. Did the Fifth Circuit err in claiming that Mr. Carmouche did not present a substantial showing of the denial of Constitutional rights? .
Docket Entries
2019-06-03
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-21
Waiver of right of respondent Jason Kent, Warden to respond filed.
2019-05-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2019.
2018-10-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 3, 2019)
Attorneys
Jason Kent, Warden
Robert L Odinet Sr. — 15th Judicial District Attorney Office, Respondent
Robert L Odinet Sr. — 15th Judicial District Attorney Office, Respondent