No. 18-8684

Robert E. Young v. Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2019-04-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 7th-amendment administrative-law burden-of-proof civil-procedure civil-rights due-process jury-trial mixed-cases pro-se-litigants pro-se-litigation rules-of-evidence standing summary-judgment
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2019-05-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the 7th District Court and the 7th Circuit Court deny the Appellant the protection and benefits granted by the 5th and 7th Amendments?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Did the 7th District Court and the 7th Circuit Court in it's concurrence of the lower court's ruling, deny the Appellant the protection and benefits granted to him by the Sth (Due Process) and 7th (Right to Jury Trial) Amendments of the United States Constituion? 2. Whether the 7th District and Circuit Courts fail to acknowledge, consider and apply the United States Merit Systems Protection Board Administrative Laws concerning the burden of proof of a charge of misconduct with a label charge, a Intra-Circuit conflict with their ruling nd binding precedent of the United States Supreme Court in applying the Rules of Law in Civil Procedure, Rules of Evidence and Summary Judgment? 3. Should the mandates and case law of the Federal Circuit because of it's exclusive subject matter jurisdiction be considered controlling precedence for the other U.S. Court of Appeals ajudicating the same subject matter under mixed-cases? 4. Is there a biased against pro-se litigants and/or a conflict of interest when the attorney for the respondent also works for the Department of Justice in the 7th District and Circuit Courts ? viii

Docket Entries

2019-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-04-10
Waiver of right of respondent Brennan, Postmaster General to respond filed.
2019-03-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 3, 2019)

Attorneys

Brennan, Postmaster General
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Robert E. Young
Robert E. Young — Petitioner
Robert E. Young — Petitioner