Whether the petitioner's 5th, 6th, 8th, and 13th Amendment constitutional rights were violated by the United States government and the petitioner's counsel

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Pe} tionmens VS. Con stitutiona | Rights i yth Sth, pth and 13th whene all Violate by Urled States od pmenica, and Fravk S Riccio , oo.aok 44, do. He was 4old to do impond ant things many —t/é by the PetitioveR thet was jmportnat 40 DP foe the eviceotany Han? Some of i4 W45 evidence thet wes never REZ — pasted on oXtAIKee by the ys. ok amen! Ai Groveement bot Petition psked Coevnmse! el 4o Reguest ‘pall evidence +A-ZPelpronet asked him 4s boing honed Why didw'4 Lounge! ever reguest fhe \ = ——__—— Cvidence from YeRizon wireless he was ei 40 do 7 Petitionen asked About mary impohtant issveS OP and beteee Decemb’® 30, 3017 that was ‘mpontant Ao his Acoeingy " pppendix E", why did Covnsel Reet Sle a 1 OSC-S, $2703 (6) with yaroo+ Come Lt should of ben £iled vader The Stored Commuvication 07. Covnse\ Shoo ld of checked with yahoo. com The original De P.L 098 nad Chais €eom peo: Com. ) on petitionen 4 Handdriv® was mever brovyht enw pe evidene« why aidw 4 ypugel EVER guesticn “hat happen of hoo Cn A whole wee betone He FOF. Started endragcmet ard ponsvei of Bimncemt Victin® He Petidionet ow G-1l-Jolo, aud _b93-Ao!0, goo sce Jal Wappen ® Ce " tenpoe a a vssves Covwsel Choose +o do nothing About, Ay thew Ce Covwcel Violated the Relitiomen's Rights nb+ only of KE OiS, Consfisional Ri ntdo Doe Piocess, but mary othen Rights