No. 18-8699

Marckenson Chery v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2019-04-04
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-2422b criminal-offense criminal-offense-element double-jeopardy fifth-amendment indictment sixth-amendment statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-05-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether an indictment for violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) must identify the ''criminal offense'' element in order to meet the required nature of the accusation and double jeopardy clauses under the Sixth and Fifth Amendments of the United States Constitution

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1.) Whether an indictment for violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) must identify the ''criminal offense'' element in order to meet the required nature of the accusation and double jeopardy clauses under the Sixth and Fifth Amendments of the United States Constitution. 2.) Whether the definition of '' Sexual Act'' found in 18 U.S.C. § 2246(2)(D) also defines the term '' Sexual Activity '' in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). 3.) Whether Relation-Back Doctrine pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(C)(1)(B) prohibits the review of an amended claim which shares the same nature as an originally timely filed claim. QUES .

Docket Entries

2019-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-04-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-11-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 6, 2019)

Attorneys

Marckenson Chery
Marckenson Chery — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent