DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Whether the Petitioner Webb-EL's habeas corpus petition raising claims of actual innocence and illegal confinement warrants Supreme Court review
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ' I. Whether, the Petitioner Webb-EL, a mentally ill Moorish-American Citizen, or any other State, or Federal Prisoner's, Title 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(3) Writ of Habeas Corpus Petition, Present to the Supreme Court, actual innocence, and illegally ’ confinement claims of exceptional. circumstance, that warrants the. Supreme Court, to exercise its discretionar powers in granting the petitioner, writ of habeas corpus relief. Whereas, the petitioner, declares herein that he can not obtain adquaet relief in the lower United States Court of : Appeals For the Third Circuit, nor, in the United States District Court For the Middle District of Pennsylvania. . Where, both federal court's, unlawfully refused to Address, , and Dispose of the petitioner, actual innocence, and illegally confinement claims, and issue's, that was raise in the lower federal court's, pursuant, well establish federal law that has been determine by the Supreme Court decision's Mcquiggin v. Perkins, 133 SCt 1924, 185 L. Ed 2d 1019 (2013); Also, . under Schulp v. Delo, 513 S. Ct. 851, 130 L. Ed 808 (1995) Which mandated both federal court's, to have addressed, and Disposed of the petitioner, actual innocene, and illegally confinement claims, and issues for 2241(c)(3) writ of habeas corpus statute for relief. II. Whether, the petitioner Webb-EL, a Moorish-American Federal Prisoner, or any other State, or Federal American Prisoners, that are incarcerated under similar circumstances; i. ' Writ of Habeas Corpus Petition, raise paramoumt public improtant deprvation Human Rights violation pursuant to the Universal Declaration Human Rights Treaty, Adopted and proclaim by the General Assembly resolution 217 A III of December 10, 1948 Articles 3 thru Article 9. And deprvation of the petitioner, 5th, 8th, and 13tth Amendments Substantiail, and Procedural Due Process of Law Const. Right's forvesort to the Title 28 USE §:2241(c)(3)"wirt of habeas corpus fo raise a claim of actual innocence, and illegal confinememnt élaim for relief. Should be settled by the Supreme Court. The petitioner Webb-EL, ask the Supreme Court the Federal Question Whether, Congress in the case at bar has suspended the Writ of ° ‘ Habeas Corpus pursuant to the Constitutional Suspension Clause pursuant, to Article 1, § 9, cl.2 of the Constitution, which . Clearly state to wit!" ‘he Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it. Or under Title 28 usc . § 2241(c)(3) Writ of Hbease Corpus Statute. : ‘ And if the answer is no. Whether, the petitioner, a Moorih-American Citizen Federal Prisoner, or any other State, and Federal American Federal Prisoner's that are incarcerated under similar circumstances; Who, is being confin in the territoral jurisdisdiction of the United States of America. In voluntray servitude against his well unlawfully in federal custody in violation of the Constitutio, and the Laws of the United States, for an non-existing capital offense charge ; for second degree murder, that the petitioner, was not charged by an Federal Grand Jury, in Count One of the U.S. Government July 16, 1985 superseding indictment. ii. The petitioner, ask the Supreme Court, the Second Federal @onstitutional Question, Is the Federal Statute under Title 28 usc § 2255 motion, and § 2255(e) Saving Clause, unconstitutional in the manner the lower u.S. Third Circuit Appellate Court, and the U.S. District Court For the Middle District of Pennsylvania, application, and construing the above mention described federal statues in such a manner against the petitioner. As a procedural bar rule, to preciued the petitioner Webb-EL federal § 2241(c)(3) writ of habeas corpus review.of his claims of actual innocence, and illegal confinement claims for habeas relief. , The petitioner, ask the Supreme court the third Federal Constitutional ‘Question. Was the petitioner, Human Rights, and 5th, 8th, and 13th Amendment's