No. 18-8715
Quillie Merle Spray v. Kelly A. Ryan, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Shirley
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-law criminal-procedure effective-counsel fair-trial insanity-defense mental-evaluation sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
HabeasCorpus CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-05-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court of Appeals correctly decided an important question of constitutional law: that the Petitioner was denied his right to effective counsel under the Sixth Amendment, where counsel failed to request a mental evaluation and pursue an insanity defense
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED I. Whether the Court of Appeals correctly decided an important question of constitutional law: that the Petitioner was denied his right to effective counsel under the Sixth Amendment, where counsel failed to request a mental evaluation and pursue an insanity defense. -i
Docket Entries
2019-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-04-18
Waiver of right of respondent Kelly Ryan to respond filed.
2019-04-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 6, 2019)
Attorneys
Kelly Ryan
Quillie Spray
Kenneth I. Seiger — Attorney at Law, Petitioner