Does the blanket denial of a certificate of appealability by the district court violate the rule announced in Slack v. McDaniel?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. DOES THE BLANKET DENIAL OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY BY THE DISTRICT COURT VIOLATE THE RULE ANNOUNCED IN SLACK V. MCDANIEL? II. DOES 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2) OR IT'S PRINCIPLES APPLY TO FEDERAL PEPITIONERS? = 2 i: III. WAS THE DECISION OF THE DISTRICT COURT AND THE NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS SO FAR DEPARTED FROM THE ACCEPTED AND USUAL COURSE OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS AS TO CALL FOR AN EXERCISE OF THIS COURT'S SUPERVISORY POWER? : Iv. IS THE PETITIONER ACTUALLY INNOCENT OF THE GUIDELINES ENHANCE: MENT IN LIGHT OF ESQUIVEL-QUINTANA V. SESSIONS?