Was the defendant's counsel ineffective for failing to properly investigate and present evidence of a plea agreement?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED The A epEllnie Cora erated whee ' wile We, Was Onlillely Counsel could Wave porfeeled tw foe Regarh~y pay agpecemenrd so Tesh, Dating Tie eke Nesting , whe Reterd WS” efarited “s To The ar, EUifence oa tack Phere ~ Coumsel may have o . TO PerFeed \ we Peechanery, D Fenda 1 Copuse b ackne wletge he hed as ob aumentarn/ Zvilence of Av egfeemer +. . 1 Ene SE ah Sol o F whe. Adtouney +0 Yury Vutecach KR wiknesS , defense Cousel Shoabl have wT Ake Allvieowal achoy re defeemme whether whe Phosecyton of Notwool tows wmiglake the SAmE ASA Anidia Rol mevet wha Rethel Onfew oat whale she gave ma Elen hea moles ARICe She VW denvicwed ma trorond, ma &Yleg Teshitid shed he Recieve’ These wolkes BAL They glaled Fhe SAme rhing may Kolsigue Z TOLL Wydtood “0 ers oF Phe Juey Fd Pestecé The jar Peach™, We ke had -o FO War Cary Rol eigueze 72 he Stand art Ac Feawine whellker The ProSecutor of onwad was wslateur, EW Stead he was Moke Corry qdiour Carus ) RWS Teal on Raisinn W StiveK PS Week Onlea ond, APP EW ATE Comes Sdaleh hal The le Ferhat Failed Te Shows ans Seth Cows: lemtion wag ered iy €Xchouye Yon Aofweed's Task moay . flathet a ee wdant's Sejges tiv iS chatty SPeenrtatuc hy wrhals S Pecuk dive about The ASA Sts S ww Froa( ef he “suey rhat, iS it Youw ondensteadity Theat Yours meh gory TO be getired Te luvesigatiy For Fedenae «har ges Vs Cop Perfe anal regffy and Teddity AAT 10 shis CAS 2 Mes Pol Ri pucze has Comidkel pre se cutie mS Coudoct “HM TNS \eatiay ci Agri AO, Jou mas Red nig ve 2 asm: thed untea OAL —-ket im sa vest R. Motwe( woull wei Romy To) be bcFerse tl TO \ Jesh, ‘T) Fon . | Sahew R Federal Charges i+ We Ceo pervte awk jeg FV T RUT Fun VY TWS Cage “See eerie > ; dD PX. AL Paragnash 107 | . ( b seriay was Rodai geez regi tY aqwohat he HRW 0d w put ot : pu any o SFered oxy hay Fon Wig eS {pre w <The \ . | Stake ton hee (ge heb Ways which FQ whe auth ?