No. 18-8735

David Meyers v. Walter Swiney, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-04-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights custody-status due-process mail report retaliation standing
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the U.S. District Court violate my due process rights?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I Did The U.S. DisthiGh Coukt Violate My Dur PRocess Rights “S Re busing Te Mail MA Copy OF The US. MA sth ate Yudge Amela SA Rawot's Repokt And Cx Commend tions Repokt Sow Cou id Ob; CU Lith Olah ity To HeR Disposrhon OEM Cams? 2. Did U-S.SudgeSames Jones Dany Ma Sudicral Relieh Fy FeoteCty? Costedy Status Ansel Hod 598 Bu Dismssing Saghor (733 ACh owAPHeR US, Masi sthrteyudee SARgenst tound Me Uisdek.Lmm INCATED ADE Ao} 7 PReed a Adtion 2 3. Did lek Sula Dadi Violate vy Kisirt Uncle The /s Amesdmenst OF Tha U-SCosh tution Bu Damaun The Sechon 1983 Action And feconions Mal? OF The Akos fe ¢ mT ACh oN N71 Zey dt Arse KCRPL RS The Othe Ay A how As Adtran? /8 CVS] dad 8 CouPrRepusing TS ONSal dat. Cini 1983 Ad DZ missin AN? On) 407 ’ a 4, Did Us Sadee ies Youd Bese Bn cpa eee [80st AchomWe-7'/8ey AF Clams |,Q 375 ©17,8,9,/0, 11.19 93 Ard (4 To Dotentional Ow Planstibp Mek toRious Citi Phayarst Plamtifh Ffom Ob HAminsg Monetary DAMASSfoQUakLmmaei Dro. . wey -. 3. Diol U-S-SudgrTA mes Sones jj. IS-Q20/8 Opinion That Was Zracca ket? DoPolmirhw 7) at ie Reoeved That Pa ashy 2p Recavad& DiSCiphivply OF Feosa Repok+ ZRPRaCH ID Awol Lemond FRam Tha FRetectue Custody Unit @ Poantals PR Dismissa IAS TS My SaPetal aims? Gs WhereT PotPied US. Judge SAMeS Sones That DePend mart (y) SO sew Kad Retahated On M2 Apd Had OFF Oe D: Bake Kile A Tals 2018 Chakxe On Me falsef Allesiy k p BACK The PC Unsit frou h Ted, ake used’ ToGo 7 Sucka Famers S11 Mea Rit PTI Cou ki~ Gate ANDyunction® © When US-T uae James ONeS Denied All Claims ¢ FoR My Claim Ov bo.Swmey Ave D.C. Stallaed Reboot teat Me Flom TRS Dometes MAbL0x ThPort se Eee Rud ; 1 MMe MotPad Consttrtrnwal By Him Alioasrn3 Siw 0ey To Remove, ye beam PRotechye CustodsStahus? Bs Diol My Cass 1, 8,3,4,8,6, 7, ¥,9,/6 ji, 12,13, Mod [4 AU Should Have Bean Heald By The Horokable Coukt Unde Zn nab DArsek Clams Based On TPs DePordpstid Seoine ‘Removed Me fkam PC Status APRK Allows Tam wee Sam AR Thompson Re Asspuning? PD jd The Gubrts OF Widents 7hat L Submitted Te C.S-Coukt OF Appeals 4fth CRourtHwed Dtkus Ane Did Have ColoLable Soong OF Znmmesndangek. Cmims ?

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-08-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-06
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-06-03
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2019.
2019-05-10
Waiver of right of respondent UNITED STATES to respond filed.
2019-03-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 10, 2019)

Attorneys

David Meyers
David Meyers — Petitioner
David Meyers — Petitioner
UNITED STATES
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent