No. 18-8748
Dajuan A. Alridge v. Louisiana
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3)IFP
Tags: batson-challenge batson-v-kentucky civil-rights due-process eighth-amendment equal-protection jury-selection jury-unanimity juvenile-sentencing non-unanimous-jury prima-facie prima-facie-case racial-discrimination
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment
DueProcess Punishment
Latest Conference:
2020-04-24
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether statistics alone are sufficient to demonstrate a prima facie case of discrimination in the first step of a Batson analysis?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether statistics alone are sufficient to demonstrate a prima facie case of discrimination in the first step of a Batson analysis? } 2. Whether life without the possibility of parole is an excessive sentence for a juvenile who was convicted by a non-unanimous jury in a circumstantial evidence case? 3. Whether the Fourteenth Amendment fully incorporates the Sixth Amendment guarantee of a unanimous verdict? i
Docket Entries
2020-05-30
MANDATE ISSUED.
2020-05-30
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
2020-04-27
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>Ramos</i> v. <i>Louisiana</i>, 590 U. S. ___ (2020). Justice Alito, concurring in the decision to grant, vacate, and remand: In this and in all other cases in which the Court grants, vacates, and remands in light of <i>Ramos</i> v. <i>Louisiana</i>, I concur in the judgment on the understanding that the Court is not deciding or expressing a view on whether the question was properly raised below but is instead leaving that question to be decided on remand.
2020-04-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/24/2020.
2019-08-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-22
Brief of respondent State of Louisiana in opposition filed.
2019-05-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 22, 2019.
2019-05-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 7, 2019 to July 22, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-05-08
Response Requested. (Due June 7, 2019)
2019-05-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.
2019-04-24
Waiver of right of respondent State of Louisiana to respond filed.
2019-04-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 9, 2019)
Attorneys
Dajuan Alridge
Cecelia Trenticosta — The Capital Appeals Project, Petitioner
Cecelia Trenticosta — The Capital Appeals Project, Petitioner
State of Louisiana
Michelle Ward Ghetti — Attorney General, State of Louisiana, Respondent
Michelle Ward Ghetti — Attorney General, State of Louisiana, Respondent
Elizabeth Baker Murrill — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Elizabeth Baker Murrill — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent