No. 18-875

Albert G. Hill, III, et al. v. PBL Multi-Strategy Fund, L.P.

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-01-08
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: appellate-procedure appellate-review circuit-courts circuit-split civil-procedure evidence evidence-standards judicial-review procedural-uniformity remand standards-of-review summary-judgment uniform-standards
Key Terms:
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-02-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Should the Court grant the petition, vacate the judgment below, and remand to the District Court for further proceedings, because the Court of Appeals failed to observe established standards for consideration of evidence in connection with a motion for summary judgment, in order to provide uniform standards for all circuits.

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Should the Court grant the petition, vacate the judgment below, and remand to the District Court for further proceedings, because the Court of Appeals failed to observe established standards for consideration of evidence in connection with a motion for summary judgment, in order to provide uniform standards for all circuits. (i) ii LIST OF ALL

Docket Entries

2019-02-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.
2019-02-01
Waiver of right of respondent PBL Multi-Strategy Fund, L.P. to respond filed.
2018-12-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 7, 2019)

Attorneys

Albert G. Hill, III, et al.
Emil Lippe Jr.Law Offices of Lippe & Associates, Petitioner
PBL Multi-Strategy Fund, L.P.
Lawrence FischmanGlast, Phillips & Murray, P.C., Respondent