No. 18-8755

Matthew Ryan Murdoch v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-04-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-law criminal-procedure criminal-restrictions due-process first-amendment freedom-of-speech liberty liberty-interest sentencing sex-offender statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess FirstAmendment
Latest Conference: 2019-05-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a lifetime prohibition on going to 'locations where any form of pornography, sexually stimulating performances, or sexually oriented material, items, or services are available' violates due process and involves a greater deprivation of liberty than permitted by statute and this Court's prior precedents?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. | Whether a lifetime prohibition on going to “locations where any form of pornography, sexually stimulating performances, or sexually oriented material, items, or services are available” violates due process and involves a greater deprivation of liberty than permitted by statute and this Court’s prior precedents? 1 LIST OF ALL

Docket Entries

2019-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-04-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-04-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 10, 2019)

Attorneys

Matthew Ryan Murdoch
Jarrod James BeckLaw Office of Jarrod J. Beck, PLLC, Petitioner
Jarrod James BeckLaw Office of Jarrod J. Beck, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent