No. 18-8755
Matthew Ryan Murdoch v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-law criminal-procedure criminal-restrictions due-process first-amendment freedom-of-speech liberty liberty-interest sentencing sex-offender statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess FirstAmendment
DueProcess FirstAmendment
Latest Conference:
2019-05-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a lifetime prohibition on going to 'locations where any form of pornography, sexually stimulating performances, or sexually oriented material, items, or services are available' violates due process and involves a greater deprivation of liberty than permitted by statute and this Court's prior precedents?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. | Whether a lifetime prohibition on going to “locations where any form of pornography, sexually stimulating performances, or sexually oriented material, items, or services are available” violates due process and involves a greater deprivation of liberty than permitted by statute and this Court’s prior precedents? 1 LIST OF ALL
Docket Entries
2019-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-04-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-04-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 10, 2019)
Attorneys
Matthew Ryan Murdoch
Jarrod James Beck — Law Office of Jarrod J. Beck, PLLC, Petitioner
Jarrod James Beck — Law Office of Jarrod J. Beck, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent