No. 18-8761

Arthur Jones v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2019-04-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 8th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process jury-trial sentencing
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2019-05-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the California Penal Code §1192.7(c) that removes assessment of fact from the jury used to increase punishment is unconstitutional under the Apprendi principle

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | ; (1) Whethee @ Conduet Snthanes ment Stalute Calf, Penal Code $£2.1192.7(2) a 7 That” Removes, Assessment’ of Frat From | | Tuy wsed.7 Tndesast Punishment’ ig . oe —Undonst bub onal uv ler Apprend Pawdipls. | (A) Pen Prineiple of AppAeli, IF 1S "UNeowetted — | = toa)” Fon. Legisltune To Remous Any 8 Assessmeut of Fact, That TneRtase Pumishméalt FRom Thé Jury . , Cb) TE Calif. chalube That Removes ASSESSnewh of Fact From Tht Jury, used, To Twdatase Punishment is Udtonstitut oval, Ther tis Repug nant To : U.S. donstitubion. : @) The Constitutional Qusshon of Law, Is | . Tmpontant, fo<cAuse "Tile gal Lente ees ” | Have Been Imposed on Inmates That _ OvEReMowded CANE. Prisons,

Docket Entries

2019-05-20
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.
2019-04-26
Waiver of right of respondent California to respond filed.
2019-01-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 9, 2019)

Attorneys

Arthur Jones
Arthur Jones — Petitioner
Arthur Jones — Petitioner
California
Tami Michelle KrenzinOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent
Tami Michelle KrenzinOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent