Whether a state conviction entered via an Alford plea creates an irrebuttable presumption such that a defendant in a federal supervised release revocation hearing, who is charged with committing a new offense, is prohibited from rebutting the violation with evidence of innocence?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether a state conviction entered via an Alford plea creates an irrebuttable presumption such that a defendant in a federal supervised release revocation hearing, who is charged with committing a new offense, is prohibited from rebutting the violation with evidence of innocence?