Whether Mr. Le was convicted by a non-unanimous jury in violation of his rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Reasonable jurists would determined that Mr. Le was convicted by a non-unanimous jury ia violation of his rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments and equivalent provisions of the Louisiana Constitution. 2. Reasonable jurists would debate that Mr. Le was denied a fair and impartial trial with the submission of testimony from “Expert” witnesses which failed to meet the Daubert ; standard, in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. . \MepdoS Ics p-deonstenceso\My Tam #605788\Le Tam ushabwrt.odt . . INTERESTED PARTIES District Attorney's Office 22™ Judicial District Court 701 N. Columbia St. Covington, LA 70433 Darrel Vannoy, Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary General Delivery Angola, LA 70712 Tam 4605788\Le Tam ushabwrtodt