Retroactive amendment of U.S. Constitution's ex-post facto law

question(s) presented / RULE IAA (A) [1] Absent a constitutional anendment promulgated by the U.S. Congress, under what circumstances {if any} does a legislative body have a lawful right to amend/improve the U.S. Constitution’s Article 1, sections 9 & 10 ex-post : facto law {which in it’s literal syntax provides for no alternate meaning or _ ambiguity} retroactively so-as to extend an active time bar? [2] What protects criminally convicted Defs/Ptrs with dyslexia/dementia from judicial {S.C.} and prosecutorial vindictiveness culminating in ; impediment of constitutional protections as-with protections afforded via . ; “The Americans with Disabilities Act”? [3] By what lawful authority is any court {be that federal or state} . empowered to violate criminally convicted Defs/Ptrs constitutional protection(s) of equal justice, due process and redress of grievance? [4] At what point is a victim of a criminal offense held accountable for laches resulting in double jeopardy initiated by victim molestation of the offender? | [5] Does aS.C. have a lawful right to retroactively override it’s own statute so-as to resentence criminally convicted Defs/Ptrs {beyond the legislated rule 35c’s 7 day window /time-bar} culminating in a more onerous punishment ? ; U.S. Supreme Court Writ of certiorari 2018-11-27 RULE /4, 1 @) List of additional {el al} parties Parties not appearing in the caption in the case on the cover page are as . follows {et al}: Deputy Attorney General for the State of Delaware “Carolyn S. Hake” , 820 N. French St. Wilmington, De. 19802 ; : I-A , . : Lf CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED PART 1 0F 2. ARTICLE | SECTIONS 4¢-10> Sie SIATEMENT © P66. 5.457, fo4 b QUESTON, . th DUE PROCES CA DouRLE TO PARDISEE STATEMENT CPES, (24138. ALSO SEE NPE DA" EXWBIT? SEHC-& yu 8 NH SY S0~-1 ZESAC JIP-2 LEH! AMENDMENT RIGUT 10 LOT *TRAKTN) vrTHoUT REPRESBHCTON SEE SATEM ENT € PS.17 CEE APPENIMK “O" PXUBIT 1S DELC 2" AMENDMENT. OF GRIEVANCE: (MPELYM SPE SAVEMENT € PES 16,19 A 19228 SEE APPEM DM “AS EXHIBITS: (HEY § I 20 wow BE gs MA-2,3, 506 +8 28 USC 2254 YD Exe pT MG) PAR PRI CEDURA L DEKAU: N EXHAUSTED SEM EN/ ES INCLUIVE oF Ned trae’ hae a BR MIERICAMC adit MSA BILITIEL “ACTSEE STATEMENT © P68. ID AB Qe ADP ENDIK 8S EMMBZS MAE 35648 SEE QUESTION He 2. RULED S203) AS WHT WE DIEL.CHEESD MENIED AOCESS TS MATERMQ LLY SURSTANITVE BLEMEATS ct PSI RE/YRT $2 SATEMENT € (es. LI, 270t-29 SEE APPENDIN NG? BXWUBITY Bo, SEE APPENDI "DY UNBIT Sc C RULES 25/0) HO)> ANYTIME CORRECTION OF AV LLLESAL SENTENCE AD 1 DAY tH oad CURT MAY CoRRECT 71° SEAITEAICE (c) SEE STATE: MENT & pe 12. [3+ , | See GUINEAS Site APPENON A” EXM BIT: VE BY EMM RIT: MA 235608 TE” BKWARITS: RBS, 19-162. ge CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PRoVIS0NS INVLIED PART 2 OF 2 DEL, C.3%1 E> WIC ENT TME-SERVED CRED DURINGPR PERIOD OF PROVISIONAL (BML) LIBERTE SEE STATEMENT ©7517 7M F SEE APPEND E” EXHEITS: B+ B2 Ui DBL C. E513 ¢4322> prsrbcrin) CRIM WSARY PRIMB/TS SORNA _ FROM Agee dVi= (oMMUMITY NOEL OATION AND MARK ETVE OF SUA. > St STATEMENT € PG, I Skis APPEND KSC” FRINBIT: boe9 Lh OL. 0. H2IND)> PREM RITES AY LEBIOLATION THAT GASTRAI CTS ThE IMPLiem ETA Tol OP A STATUTE BARRING sure URNA'C MMU TTY MOTTELCATION/ BARRED BY | CEB ALS 22 GINTUTES ABE. | StH AMENDMENT SEUTENAN & cooRT!C "Alo CONTACT” OF PTR'S MoU CHM IZID 0) B/OL.06/ (AL. OPECPRIN CBelt AM OFF IPRING ARE S7ERSISTER , AND RROTRER OE VicTIM Uv 040P, SEB AMP EAI DIX D” EKWAT CAHZ. GEIS UW. de H.C. ASSATEM ZE LRE Tend 1S ops APPEN DIXYAY eabieR> . «U.9 THIRD RMIT * SUBTITLE UARGUMENT® @ PE. IY 8 2018-11-27 Supreme Court Writ of Certiorari