Whether the 11th Circuit courts must suppress the fruits of the admitted to illegal search and seizure

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. WHETHER THE 11TH CIRCUIT COURTS MUST SUPPRESS THE FRUITS OF THE ADMITTED TO ILLEGAL SEARCH AND SEIZURE, WHICH OCCURED OUTSIDE OF THEIR AND‘ WAS BASED UPON.:A PIECE MEAL WARRANT AND ILLEGAL SEARCHING OF PHONE AND CURTILAGE 2. WHETHER THE CAREER OFFENDER SENTENCE MUST BE VACATED WHEN THE STATE HAS CONCEDED THAT THE PETITIONER WAS SENTENCED INCORRECTLY , TWICE, AND THE EX POST FACTO VIOLATIONS OCCURED IN BOTH PRIORS’ A RELIED UPON BY THE DISTRICT COURT? , ; 3. Dib THE COA PANEL VIOLATE THE BUCK V DAVIS RULING WHEN IT . CLEARLY PERFORMED A MERITS ANALYSIS ON THE COA STAGE & DOES ITY REQUIRE THE JUDGMENT TO BE VACATED SO THAT THE PETITIONER MAY BE HEARD ON THE MERITS? (i)