No. 18-8785
Temarco Sartorio Pope, Jr. v. United States
Tags: 2nd-amendment civil-rights concealed-carry criminal-procedure due-process fourth-amendment law-enforcement police-powers reasonable-suspicion terry-stop
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether law enforcement can presume any concealed carry of a firearm is unlawful and conduct a Terry stop when the state statute does not criminalize the concealed carry of a firearm with a permit?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED (1) Whether law enforcement can presume any concealed carry of a firearm is unlawful and conduct a Terry stop when the state statute does not criminalize the concealed carry of a firearm with a permit? (2) Whether the Terry frisk analysis is a two-part test, requiring law enforcement to have reasonable suspicion that an individual is both armed and dangerous, and that law enforcement cannot assume anyone who is armed is automatically dangerous? ii
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-10
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2019-06-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 10, 2019.
2019-06-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 10, 2019 to July 10, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-05-09
Response Requested. (Due June 10, 2019)
2019-05-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2019.
2019-04-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-04-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 13, 2019)
Attorneys
Temarco Sartorio Pope
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent