Danny D. Bissonette v. Robert Dooley, Warden, et al.
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus Securities Privacy
Did the state court err in failing to set aside the conviction of a federally recognized tribal member living in Indian country?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; 1.. Did the Seventh Judicial Circuit Court of Pennington County. .o South Dakota error when it failed to set-aside the Judgment of Conviction, once it was notified Petitioner iS. an-Enrolited Member of a.Federally recognized Indian Tribe, and he was living in Indian : f County, yet he had been prosecuted by the STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA? 2. Did the SOUTH DAKOTA SUPREME COURT, error when it failed to provide remedy to Petitioner by overturning the Seventh Judicial Circuit Court of Pennington County, South Dakota's denial for remedy concerning an Enrolled Tribal Member of a Federally recognized Tribe, . who was unlawfully prosecuted by a STATE Court? 3. Did the U.S. District,Court of South Dakota, Western Division, . error when it denied Petitioner the right to use Title 28 U.S.C.:Sec. 2241 to attack a Fort Laramie Treaty Violation which is causing him to be incarcerated unlawfully in a STATE Prison? . . 4. Did the Eighth Circuit Court of Appealserror when it : affirmed the U.S. Distict Court of South Dakota, Western Division's denial of Petitioner's use of Title 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 to attack a : Fort Laramie Treaty Violation which is causing him to be incarcerated unlawfully in a STATE Prison? : (i) > 7? pe ee