No. 18-8794

Ricky Raymond Ball v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-04-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: appeal-waiver criminal-procedure due-process judicial-explanation manifest-injustice plea-agreement plea-bargaining supervised-release
Key Terms:
Privacy
Latest Conference: 2019-05-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Mr. Ball can be held to his waiver under Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(b)(1)(N)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Mr. Ball entered a plea of guilty. He signed a plea agreement including a waiver of substantial aspects of his right to appeal. After he filed notice of appeal, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal based on the government’s motion invoking the waiver. The case presents the following questions. 1. Whether Mr. Ball can be held to his waiver under Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(b)(1)(N) when, rather than informing Mr. Ball of the extent to which he was waiving his right to appeal, the magistrate judge simply referred to the relevant plea agreement provision by page and paragraph number, and asked Mr. Ball if he understood it? 2. Whether allowing the enforcement of an appeal waiver to prevent review of oppressive supervised release conditions unrelated to Mr. Ball’s offense conduct would result in manifest injustice? i

Docket Entries

2019-05-28
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2019.
2019-04-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-04-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 13, 2019)

Attorneys

Ricky Ball
Elizabeth Unger CarlyleCarlyle Parish LLC, Petitioner
Elizabeth Unger CarlyleCarlyle Parish LLC, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent