No. 18-8799
Robert Gordon Lockwood v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: bank-robbery bank-robbery-statute categorical-approach crime-of-violence criminal-law descamps-ruling due-process firearms johnson-ruling mathis-ruling ninth-circuit sentencing statutory-interpretation supreme-court supreme-court-precedent violent-crime
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Immigration
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-05-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals violate the Johnson, Mathis, Descamps, and Dimaya Supreme Court rulings because Prince confirmed that the Bank Robbery Statue has non-violent elements?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED : Did the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals violate the Johnson, Mathis, Descamps, and Dimaya Supreme Court rulings because Prince confirmed that the Bank Robbery Statue has non-violent elements? ITs Bawk Rekbery & crime of violence. Cvew Thovalk There are nowe violent meaws iw the DF Bank Robbery 1S NOT Ww emme oF | oo, Violewee » Should Per Trewers Firearms acmS @n~ — WAONte mMewlT Fer w~ Efwe of Violewee ) 00
Docket Entries
2019-05-28
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2019.
2019-04-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-01-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 13, 2019)
Attorneys
Robert Lockwood
Robert Gordon Lockwood — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent