Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the District (Trial) Court err in Allowing trial to proceed without first obtaining a written WAIVER consent from Petitioner/Plaintiff?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Did the District (Trial) Court érr-in Allowing trial to proceed without first obtaihing A written WAIVER consent from Was the opinion of The Fourth Court Of Appeals Unconstitutional by adopting and approving a WAIVER DEFENSE? Should the Supreme Court Of Texas consider a MOTION FOR DEFAULT Judgement when a Respondent Failed to respond to a MOTION FOR REVIEW? Did Petitioner, RAYMOND voluntarily, intentionally, and knowingly WAIVED his Constitutional right to call discovery witnesses at trial? 5 Whether or not failure to Cite Authorities In Amended Brief warrant a DENIAL of thé ty Appeal? Did the Fourth Court Of Appeals incorrectly ruled on unsubstantiated WAIVER 7 Defense raised by the Defendant? Tk Can A Counsel WAIVE the Constitutional rights of its clients before or on the day of ay trial? ; Approximately two-thirds of federal plea bargains contain provisions that waive the defendant's right to appeal his or her sentence. While the courts of appeals generally enforce those waivers, there are established exceptions for situations in which enforcing the waiver would, for example, result in a “manifest injustice.” See, e.g., United States v. . Grimes, 739 F.3d 125, 128-29 (3d Cir. 2014). This case raises the question of wh Kent v. United States, 383 U. S. 541, 383 U. S. 562 (1966), held "that the [waiver] hearing must measure up to the essentials of due process and fair treatment.” 2
2020-03-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-02-25
Petitioner complied with order of June 10, 2019.
2019-12-31
Application (19A33) for further extension granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until February 29, 2020.
2019-12-21
Application (19A33) for a further extension of time within which to comply with the order of June 10, 2019, submitted to Justice Alito.
2019-10-28
Application (19A33) for further extension granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until December 31, 2019.
2019-10-18
Application (19A33) for a further extension of time within which to comply with the order of June 10, 2019, submitted to Justice Alito.
2019-10-07
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2019-07-10
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-08
Application (19A33) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until November 1, 2019.
2019-06-26
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2019-06-26
Application (19A33) for an extension of time within which to comply with the order of June 10, 2019, submitted to Justice Alito.
2019-06-10
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until July 1, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2019-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2019.
2019-04-29
Waiver of right of respondent Pizza Ventures of San Antonio, LLC to respond filed.
2018-11-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 13, 2019)