Whether the ruling in Marbury v. Madison still stands

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; 1. IN MARBURY VERSES MADISON, THIS COURT HELD, "IT IS EMPHATICALLY . . THE PROVINCE AND DUTY OF THE JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT TO SAY WHAT THE LAW IS," DOES THIS RULING YET STAND TO DATE? ; : 2. IF A PERSON APPLY FOR ISSUANCE OF A PETITION FOR WRIT OF : MANDAMUS, AND BY ORDER OF THE COURT, PAY THE FILING FEE IN FULL. WHAT HAPPENS TO THE MONEY WHEN THE APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS IS REJECTED BY THE COURT? 3. CAN AN APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS BE CHANGED BY A COURT . TO A NOTICE OF APPEAL? ; 4. CAN A MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT BE CHANGED TO A PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS? : 5. IF AN OFFICER OF THE UNITED STATES FAILS, AND OR REFUSE TO TAKE . JUDICIAL NOTICE OF ACTS IN VIOLATION OF ACTS OF CONGRESS, WHAT IS THE PROPER REMEDY AND OR COURSE TO TAKE, TO WHICH SOUGHT OF . A REMEDY MIGHT MANIFEST? . 6. IF THE JUDGMENT OF.A COURT IS CHALLENGED ON JURISDICTION, CAN A COURT AVOID SUCH CHALLENGE BY CHANGING THE NATURE OF THE PROCEEDINGS? ; . 7. WHAT-CONSTITUTES A VOID JUDGMENT? 8. WHEN AN OFFICER OF THE COURT IS CHALLENGED ON GROUNDS OF . IMPARTIALITY, OR BIAS OR PREJUDICE, WHAT WOULD BE THE PROPER ; FORUM TO ASCERTAIN THE TRUTHS ON THE MERITS? . : (i) : if ‘ QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 9. WHEN THE NINTH CIRCUIT JUDGES/JUSTICES MADE THE DECISION TO CLOSE PETITIONER'S PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. DID THE NINTH CIRCUIT HAVE JURISDICTION TO ORDER ITS CLERK TO SERVE UPON THE DISTRICT COURT'S CLERK PETITIONER'S PETITION FOR WRIT OF : MANDAMUS, INSTRUCTING THE DISTRICT COURT CLERK TO FILE PETITIONER'S CLOSED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AS A “NOTICE OF APPEAL?" 10. DID THE DISTRICT COURT HAVE PROPER JURISDICTION OVER PETITIONER WRIT OF MANDAMUS AFTER THE NINTH CIRCUIT CLOSED MANDAMUS PROCEEDINGS? ; 11. WHAT CONSTITUTES FRAUD ON THE COURT? 12. WHAT IS THE PROPER PROCEDURE BY WHICH ALL PETITIONS FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS ARE TO BE PROCESSED? 13. WHEN THE DISTRICT COURT CLERK FILED A NOTICE OF APPEAL ON BEHALF OF OR IN COMPLIANCE WITH ORDER FROM THE NINTH CIRCUIT, : THE DISTRICT COURT CONSTRUED THE "NOTICE OF APPEAL" AS A . CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AND FORWARDED TO THE CLERK OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS WHICH PROCESSED THE "CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY" WHICH WAS ASSIGNED TO TWO JUDGES/JUSTICES WHICH DENIED SAID CERTIFICATE UNDER CONGRESS' HABEAS CORPUS REFORM ACT. IS THIS IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONGRESS' ENACTMENT OF THE FEDERAL MANDAMUS ACT? ; 14. IN MARBURY VERSES MADISON, THIS COURT ANNOUNCED, THOSE WHO APPLY THE RULE TO PARTICULAR CASES, MUST OF NECESSITY, EXPOUND AND INTERPRET THAT RULE, IF TWO LAWS CONFLICT WITH EACH OTHER. THE COURT MUST DECIDE THE OPERATION OF EACH. DOES THIS ANNOUNCEMENT YET STAND TO DATE? 15. CAN A COURT RULE UPON AN APPLICATION UPON WHICH THE APPLICANT NEVER FILED? (ii) oY ‘,