Where a criminal defendant shows that the district court made a clear legal error when applying the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, but the government responds with an alternative, debatable route through which the district court might have reached the same advisory guideline range, has the defendant satisfied the second prong of plain-error review by showing a clear or obvious error?

Where a criminal defendant shows that the district court made a clear legal error when applying the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, but the government responds with an alternative, debatable route through which the district court might have reached the same advisory guideline range, has the defendant satisfied the second prong of plain-error review by showing a clear or obvious error?