Whether the United States Court of Appeals erred in failing to grant petitioner King relief as to the denial of his motion to suppress the search warrant executed in this matter

No question identified. : I, whether the United States Court of Appeal s Erred iu tailing to Gravet Peditiower King relred As to the dental _of Suypress_the search warrant Executed iu this _inptter by the Disict Gourde a” Whether the United States Courf of Appeals Erved_ in —_faillig 42 Grant Febibiouer thing relied AS to the moios tor Judgement of Acquittal After The Government's Case WAS Presewted iw this matter? 3 Whether the United Stutes Cour of hypeals Ruled, Properly , ACCA tdineg ty Mes hing Claim ia his third. issue raised AS to whether Methiwg Counsel were wetfeed ‘ve _In Properly Assisting Him durivg the Litigation of , this matter? nccord ing fy the record At issue H. Whether the uted States Cout of Avec ls Erced LUhens they Ruled Mr. Bine was vet Denied his Sixth Amendmew-+t 11a bat to Coupsel As to whethe the District Court hailed ty iatquire Thoraug hty ito The source of the Comtlied Between hing aud His fourth KHorwey, Ultimately Dewying ing, nition cor Mei Coussel Aud Forcing Wing to proceed Prose? a | Whether the Uwited states Court of Appeals Greed Whew they Ruled that Petitioner Awe had Not establish the Iuror At issue made Adishowest Statemeut duacinsg voir dire AS to Whether the Juror Anew ing Prioc to the Tirta Kaens Abotet Mil of the facts that Led to thedrin(hud Grew up and Loved im Same Small Community AC Inestiineg Bud. bis family? CERTIEICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS AND