Whether parties to a criminal action must lodge a separate objection to the failure of a district court to address substantial arguments for a different sentence, or whether the request for a different sentence, together with the grounds proffered therefor, preserves error?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Whether parties to a criminal action must lodge a separate objection to the failure of a district court to address substantial arguments for a different sentence, or whether the request for a different sentence, together with the grounds proffered therefor, preserves error? Il. Whether 18 U.S.C. §2113(a) is divisible for purposes of categorical analysis? Subsidiary question: whether this Petition should be held in light of United States v. Davis, _U.S.__, 139 S.Ct. 782 (Certiorari Granted January 4, 2019)(18-431). il PARTIES Michael Perales is the Petitioner; he was the defendant-appellant below. The United States of America is the Respondent; it was the plaintiffappellee below. iii