No. 18-8815

Scott Randall Reich v. Mike Slagle, Correctional Administrator, Mountain View Correctional Institution

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-04-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure discovery due-process evidence evidence-suppression prosecutorial-misconduct speedy-trial standing witness-testimony
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2019-06-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Has rules of evidence precluded by Speedy Trial Act from being used to impeach witness testimony?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : QvesTion§) Presewted , di Has hales of ev/olece pac Oicoved y Speds Chapel Sea #& OishereT dot y Caw Dtek gudl choose whtl Creal apre cy Aw impeactiible siclewee will $e Lefegstcd’ é a: The Cede (sued $, Chief U.S, Distepet Stee Aeeak 0. tle vey, Decsrasee ALAM? ST on P4GE AL. Those why tyclade Louk 7 a ep ees of peocttdlips (yy the fio oly. Teapiscesarts é TT Kien ? t ’ 4 CAW C4 CAnnat Se ased behyl, BU Secle 2inclewce /ctbPowee ? (0 SOME OF peoctilings by She. 3i45 The Su ceme Loutt of The. Uviteal STATES rw AGREE ME aT with The LoucTh Crttall pkectdtdT thal thece fs CASE OF? Egu Tasle Tal; ue 8 Tie CesTetTioas ty a Fed etyel MS é105° Y! How Can! Cine Scéve philigenphs That peowe [tid Ew foctecsteT olesTeoped! Lideace Phat clemted mee wsecl Ao bitte A Wlorg hel cowvietion ? Si Fel TLawstedges Pages BL3-8/Y peveal The Ds fever” ates So plévented 7 ba m4 a Fees Leis TEE jug er “” ry Kele/ by Theedtewbs Led wT Cte wg! Chpeges ps cil ow Kécoed! Sy hee plleeney, how +s Thad wok 4 Valerio wd OF Oy Siete bad SoutTee IIb Auge nctontsp? bi My pLlesTe OFkrcet was Kies? ap The Litwe Sete, Ev idlevce clesHeoged, hé 4/s0 cdudlucfed 4 Segich &F my Cespoleate where my eiplewee Ah aye dade, fe. Wile évietewce pac Kifed m y a Théw theet~ part hell months behoce my WPedgl, pe pled guilts yo [Tee] Sed] DesTeoy Cehaiwel Evlpolesice law & chdge OV Eubizzleata’ ~ Dy Nic OF fitee | Teustee .Thif hems Spiol, bsy hb pf a Ascivtdy ylolatdod 7 withtteld thdt Ceom jucy pu $ olefel Ww Fhe. Teipl? 9: Rule b goveturye Seow XISY Case iv the Uwrtedd STit_es Lisftere7 Id ad) Loutts titled Discovecy, ZF Teel EPR LIL ay As Pive BLCO Cig i Kale 50 peoved bead, es Cscovery with bell. shoulda? p dbefewdadt Se pated? Such ‘eC seoveey ‘Aa not $e. pecused oF ‘Fis toheg ‘whew HF wis the Lule that bleugleT the vieletsd oft AIS covey Ao “be? Lisl of Parties [M4 PLL Pasties appeng in the Caption of the Case om the Cover pAge, C7 ALL Parties do mot AppeaR inthe Caption o€ the case ow the Cover page.A hist of all parties “te the peocetclinug iw the cout whose judgemeat is the subsect of +heas petition is as Follocas : (18) IS Table. of Covtewts | Opivions Below Jurisdiction ConsTTicttowal ancl STatToey feou'siows Ivolvect Stilemest of The case ReAsows Cog Geaw tig THe iefT Cowclus ion) | Index To Appendices

Docket Entries

2019-08-23
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-08-01
DISTRIBUTED.
2019-06-24
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-06-17
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2019.
2019-02-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 15, 2019)

Attorneys

Scott Randall Reich
Scott Randall Reich — Petitioner