No. 18-8826
Omar Christopher Miller v. United States
Tags: circuit-split constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process impartial-jury juror-bias jury-impartiality law-enforcement sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-10-11
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury is violated
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury is violated when prospective jurors are allowed to conceal facts that indicate possible bias — including, as here, ties to law enforcement — if they “feel, personally,” they can be fair. The Second Circuit’s answer to this question conflicts with those of the Fifth Circuit and D.C. Circuit. i
Docket Entries
2019-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-20
Reply of petitioner Omar Christopher Miller filed. (Distributed)
2019-09-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-09-05
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2019-06-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 5, 2019.
2019-06-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 15, 2019 to September 5, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-06-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 15, 2019.
2019-06-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 13, 2019 to July 15, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-05-14
Response Requested. (Due June 13, 2019)
2019-05-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2019.
2019-04-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-04-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 15, 2019)
Attorneys
Omar Christopher Miller
Matthew B. Larsen — Federal Defenders of New York, Petitioner
Matthew B. Larsen — Federal Defenders of New York, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent