No. 18-8832
Annamalai Annamalai v. Darrin Harmon, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights custody district-court due-process habeas-corpus habeas-relief illegal-custody jurisdiction legal-procedure standing warden-authority
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess HabeasCorpus Patent
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess HabeasCorpus Patent
Latest Conference:
2019-05-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court illegally suspended Habeas Relief(s) for Annamalai Annamalai
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED {. Whether the district court ' illegally ' suspended ' Habeas Relief(s) for Annamalai Annamalai and or did not dispose of Annamalai Annamalai's habeas : relief(s) sought as per ‘ Law and Justice Requires ?°" ‘Il. Whether the immediate Custodian warden Marmon and or warden True, have acted against the Constitutional rights of Annamalai Annamalai, in excess or in omission of the. Warden's authority, or without observance of procedures required by law, which all warrants an immediate release of Annamalai from an ongoing illegal custody? , ii.
Docket Entries
2019-05-28
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2019.
2019-04-30
Waiver of right of respondent UNITED STATES to respond filed.
2019-04-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 15, 2019)
Attorneys
UNITED STATES
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent