Whether the court of appeals' decision conflicts with this Court's decision in Molina-Martinez v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 1338 (2016), in concluding that an unconstitutional sentencing guideline calculation did not constitute 'prejudice' sufficient to overcome the procedural barrier to hearing a defaulted claim?

Questions Presented Whether the court of appeals’ decision conflicts with this Court’s decision in Molina-Martinez v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 1338 (2016), in concluding that an unconstitutional sentencing guideline calculation did not constitute “prejudice” sufficient to overcome the procedural barrier to hearing a defaulted claim?