No. 18-8856
Jairo Estupinan Micolta v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process illegal illegal-transfer jurisdiction legal-transfer procedural-violation standing transfer united-states-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-05-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was due process violated when Micolta was illegally transferred into the United States jurisdiction without any due process of law?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Was due process violated when Micolta was illegaly transferred into the United States jurisdiction without any due process of law. ) ii
Docket Entries
2019-05-20
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.
2019-04-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-03-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 17, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent