Whether citizens should still be afforded protection under the 14th Amendment against state abuses committed when the State disguises itself as a private corporation and uses 21st Century technology to defraud the Court

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether citizens should still be afforded protection under the 14th Amendment against state abuses committed when the State disguises itself as a private corporation and uses 21st Century technology to defraud the Court. 2. Whether the Ninth Circuit Court sanctioned the District of Hawaii’s ruling that departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings by relying on the Respondent’s Declaration while disregarding the Hawaii Revised Statutes that define state actors.