No. 18-8867

James A. Brown v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-04-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appeals civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-jurisdiction habeas-corpus standing
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-06-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the district court and court of appeals erred in dismissing petitioner's claims for lack of jurisdiction and standing

Question Presented (from Petition)

No question identified. : C POD DULL WY BeG279"9 AL AwrrBLvt7 Ow SW FNISs (Went sae AO BUS Oda AL CP LLSIOXG FPLLSNQ vO Boorzywosiw S41 s37q "CS 2 FeRI20 : VOZRLY IIOP FIQOPURIY A het W-TT7AL . FPVLHLZNDY SHY OAI7AL APRS WOW ZIASY ‘Tt 7 &é SIH AG | | LeMe?p SAL QL ALZIZOY MALE PO BLtIBeALyFao . WwW SO OCEANS FHA 2Brramngq Grad (ORL LEME7 FHL VIAL Z)\P)HHWT|E'D'SN BC FHQ “| Gat rers2 S$ orssany © > | PARTIES ALL YRRIZES AFTER DI THE CAPE) OF . THE CASE BW) THE COVER PAGE. : . . | i Lg —— Ss 9S OOH Lg or SO Sopp tS 9 2D Of —-— — — 2 By Bee vy Fura, OL KOTBLYD SHY BI2BS COBLULTWT SO ROILLEE FUG ay QL WOLLSDIOK”A FOLASNLE SO APUTVAWPSIW Bs S$70Q 'C LES Ss ALC SFICKLEMMIATP KZA IYNOYALXA 'Q O2— —— > eee Oe AXPIONML WrervoTIy yrasCscp~ 17094 'y CF — — ~— — — § Syeg2~ rersLy7I07 PVLOVIFE EY AL ARLYH OFZITAL BIGHLINOBG Seay BPrar7al 42ALMNKMLIS Kx SYzSy 'T 2, —-———~— = 5 Sra SO LYOD BHA. . OL RALZIZDY TEA LY SP DLKw27LzTLYFZ? Y Ao APCSBQCEH FHL MPcrarQ QALY COLL LAZY FHL 77AL (UM AhhHeTt E'9'S'N BT $30Q *! Lee SC BFDN BH FB TUT OWLS C — — ~~ — ~~ ~~ — SP Be LBW ALULS Z— SCOR ABH A PORS QCY TH (POLLAN LZLG COD zm —i (COREL GIAQS FANN “ APPeplrcrées Pavel BEYYENG morro) FoR RECOISTRDERATION — eee A merce) Fok PRwElL RPEXMERZEVPG — — ——— — B Deoet oF Tame BRR cen Awe FEbEAL QuESsTZor REQUEST Fee CERTZFCED QuEsrce) —— ~~ — — b MOTTE) FeR COR WET BREEF FI Saf7FPe277 ~~ & Dresrere, ceouks Tome Bax Besmzrsset ——— 7 — morro) Fork EvrbeJTrRRY HER2IPG —~——— —-G OBSECT LO FO MAGLSTRPTES REComme~hATz~e,) — . —ee SO — — ~ SFB MAALSTRATES FEME BAR REcommMeEDDSATZOYS — -——L HABEAS CORPUS PETET 3 wer BREEFS Pr SuPPORT ee era beerad oF FactuReE ro Extausr COR — — —~— — fe fimer PER CORA ~ —— — — — — ~~ © bEsr. Ct. Devral oF Sele) merzres ~ — — m Sth ER. REMAND oD FeeluRE re ZyyeussNOTELE OF RAYFERL — — — — — — — © CORRESFOPBEICE wert DEST. Ct. ConcERVZVG £4 metro) — — — — — — — — — P THe 54(&\ morme) —— —— — — @ | DESTRECT CouRT NowexteusTze-) OERBER —— R Des7. Ct Docker sHeez — —— —— —Ss ii “ TEX8S courT CREmDAAL APze7s Devoe OF N Pz —— Se PLrRECT APRPEPLS couRT oF=~tem) —-— — 7 Ut merre) Fox ABATE MEST S$U~7FL EPI ETEP wiz Sn7e BAR GREBNICE —— oe TH CUCU Y TUbGMEYT OF cCorvEcTEe)d — — —— w& Two Mertens TO QUASHY ZRH CTMNENF ~~ — X¥& CPP Perne IF — or Cl LY AFEEDAVET FOX DARRAWT AF BREST Ze iV “ AUTHORLIZES N FEREPZAL cASE LAW AurHER v. ALLEN, use Fad 1234, 1244-45 (//4h ez®. 2006) — ; — ee eee ee ae Sse eC 3| BAREFOoT Vv. ESTELLE, (03 $.Ch 3363, 3346 (1983) — — — 35 BRI S03 Vi VAUGHA, 398 F3d 225, 231 (ad ene 2005) -—S 2 Bubex v. BELL, 306 Fi2d 7 (ory ex®. 462) — — — — 13 Busy v, WATS AREGHT, 608 Ferd 400, 1y2¢—-22 (GEE ez, 4447) — — ~~ ~~ — — — 2 CARMELL Vi TEXPS, S2U U.S, $73, F22 (200) — — —— 34 CRBSETT Ue STEWART, Yoo F3d 0/4, 625 (44h czR. 2008) =F ie CRY V. U.S.) F3T/SE U.S. £23, $27,723 Sek 1072, 1076 (2003) — ~ COEMAD Vi THemPSeA>, Sol U.S. 722, 724 (:42/) ~~~ y COLL TAS v. YounGBlecb, 197 u.$.37, 4 (442) — —— 33 CRAWLEY Vv, LOTRE, 257 F3d 345, wo —e (Yh cr. 220/) BAY ve Hath, $26 A3d 13'S 1318 3 (urn cz, 200) _ aS SO Braz v. keery, SIS A3d 144 ISS -Sb (2d exe, 200%) ~— 27 Daca Vi HALKEL, $33 US, 107,172,120 5.0%, 220, 2722 . (weet) — ea ELSE Vv. Sette), 104 Fad ¢2 (F%h car. 1492) — — 12 EX rel. retlery, 204 Fi2d 12 (ad exe. 460) — —— 13 V * FesHeR Vi Sotisal,!74 Fidd 710,073 will Gr, Cz. 1949) — G:RAYMEDS v, RockFozh, 92 $.e#, 2294, 2299 —94 6472) — G20F Fr) U. RoGERS, 308 F3d 647,651-S2 (Cth cor. Hotta v. FteRDPA, 130 $.¢4,7544,2562 (200) — ——~ ¢ HuntER Vv. 5.) 101 3d 156 (i th ex, 1996) ~— — 7% EO re Burwele,76 set. 34 (98%) — — Tre uS., 664 F2d NS3,/Sb +h cxe.19592) —— — 1€ Bets S. vi CHABHA, 103 $.04+, 2764, 462 U.S$.935, W306 (/9¢3) SOS ee TEWr) Vi SEPT OF VETER ADS AFFRERS II S.Ch.YSB » USE (4%) — ~~ — —~— —-— —— —~— 3, DEFPFERTES V. BARKS ~DpALE, 4S3 4.5. UY, 10) 5. cp. CEE 3144, 3180 (lag!) — — — — ——~— — — j4 SMES Vi GLETSCH, rVIC., 484 Fi Su, 940 (ago) — ~~ 23% KG yi PVA, S64 Fd 133, (Gh czR, 2609) — — LRWREMCE Vv, FloREBA,

Docket Entries

2019-06-17
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2019.
2019-02-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 17, 2019)

Attorneys

James A. Brown
James A. Brown — Petitioner
James A. Brown — Petitioner