No. 18-8872

In Re Samuel Lewis Surles

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2019-04-17
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: actual-innocence appellate-review civil-rights constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection federal-procedure ineffective-assistance-of-counsel interrogation judicial-interpretation sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess CriminalProcedure Securities Privacy Jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether petitioner was denied his unwaivable constitutional right of due process of law when the Michigan Supreme Court failed to rule on the merits of petitioner's application for leave to appeal

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | . Ar GumenT tT. . Perinionet was dened his unwltsxnble , Right of DuE Paoc&éss oF Law wh Me : the Mithiqan Supaeme Count Factel ix is CYPORTUMTY to Rule ow The MenTs. OF Petitions ApplcaTien Fo Lepve to , . Appeal; mar me fouwm Sime Count RE— CARA cCTERized his Meru foa New Ta PULSUAM te MCL F761; MSAQBIO9FZ | Ch aGieg ‘Ts hendins +0 A Morten fod ReleP Prom Jud G Ment PANS adAnr te NCR G. 500, Without Paevidiig Oxtirionsen Wim A Wwreitten Ket. 2 WAS the CowFliaT | | had) Com Thaty te Me Unive Stwres Sapneme Count Paecéedagt of Cast ho vUnite) Stores, s¥6 Us. 3975; (a4 S.% . 78a,157 L. ed. dd. 77¥ oor) See Exhibit” (6 -J) and (F-1)] The Enin vw Kohlen dre 3 Speer nlty ARGUMENT I | Petit lon 28 Ww AS d earreal his une wl fie ne able ) Constiureatin al Riuyhr of Du& Paocess oF Law whee he was deared hus Srxcth — Amedment to EFfectivwé ASSIsTAnce — | (1) . Questions Paes ewnal Comticou es 6F Appellate Counsel duains Psrcrieucn’s Apoual of RLGAT, Zenteany w Rue P20 <e@ss And Etunl Pactecrioar of law wen: , ! whee that. Lou ns 7 H nae Pliskoes WAS Corstirutiensalhy 1k Cam pEetaenT by his Failund to make AW tarserrable INVEST ¢2Triéw wre ONetRia nro daencs tThinl Ptoceadines whieh Con SPiTuted ; Rtnuctunal BRRoaS 0a defects AT Caitical — Sanaes whi hequunes AuTomatce Revers at: (A) Petinegn Suales was denied Ars Sith Arrnedm ad Right 7 me ASSISTANC ¢. And Onrsseece of Louse duties ane Mnach 21, L96y Pola INlC6m muni cade InTERROG ATION whme PERT Lee was Cempst/al Mrdé S ETE thee idan ATInG S THT OTe Cerdyany te his Fitth Aouad ent Aight; anal de Pane oF AcTUR/ INMOCeAECE (A) Petinien ems Cou ses ef bv 1S INF . whine Fatal Eile Metin te Suppress Pole Shewupllingup den Froalten Wh Me abs ae ce oP the PRES GrECE Aned AssisTance c¢ Counsel, whirh ested ON mistaken: cd enteErc ation Uneatec es Semul y SuUG4estive, a) ( y ce) BS 2UY bf Mba WAIL If Vets JSD A(FORYAD YSYYURSD ot POPr EP FIMUISIHUU 2uU 4h SSANLIOGD PNY Levan uyy pororyuaAdng vo pest7wgns P2790 2PUBYM PYZ nepMe Lf YLUM@Y SIPMATLI+Ig bpsieug pyar Abolisanty a ~eyivg 2y Purynm IN212 Aid oF i PONDPILAYT SH OF moysitd Aur oH JESNNG) Wry L YL ywecttyf metip No PSIVY a” 7 )IWY DY Pua PAID ALIN SUV J?SNNG) 22u/)PId V/ ¢ Le Sahay 1% PP? WALS/SSY pry p7mesz2uc PUP roUnIT P2TIIKG Ww AMTIWALELS AUDIVAIPINI YO AXILVAINIANA swerrrL4ed so faded ¥ ssanlsy pru fey 24 | semIna vO] LYbTY UPNEUIYL 277/70 NY OMA NOUY NOD NOEVIIFIANIPI Anmeus SILT IT YOUU PIUMEC JO preray LONE OT aire D a/v GrUG Vv Jo MatLayinanr 13 ray Ss Ue LMP LAN YIVIY JO SOV >SNUYL Joma vn As2UY LIMA eo IY et IUD PU SY INS SSPYADIY JMIYL-IVG J[VIINYTD LSPNh2Y PV AW STLSANVNI YU [PNA — 2y NZYyq Arlyc27g42Ni AJ VIVITLV KMS OD sum AurysuH Yo S2beY > )25ROD PINI;PIA 'G / LD 47414 x9] WILT LIN PIP JMYyL, AMVYVYY NM IsIVUY 7UNG pau NUIY YY ly SIS) I YOULL sty Ani ynp SPEELS JY DOVIVI Li [2tNvneyZ PSMOJIS 19 PINWISISSY IY FD) NAISIVG Pure @bL Yad LIVE IIMA YERIS SIY pera yy sum BENAT LILIA JHU Wry Jo jWIddy NO IsuIg #4 VO4 PIMA DB BIWY FY MIYM M1109 IJIN] sym AverwyLy f] “YW saucy J2SNNA) F1M |/700Y/’ (2) SPONIL NG) ~— PRinN@eszVg sNvnLsan © : ; Quesrisus Presented — Contrrruas yy. Appell ate Counsd was teekeectlile wha he fateh t ives tig aTe anid RAnise on Pekirwuen’s diner Appel oF 26hT, thar Tam Counsel Ha tey Pliskow LW AS [he &eFF ects And i+ Competed tn his fulune -e object That Pelirwnen was dead his Sreth Ara and Ment night +o Enfey hur im aaati nd Judge, lohanée Tem Jad9oc Samuel B. Olsen bons MoT nw Keutnnt And detached MasasTaate wwhen he Sega The Crirrisiel Com 0/8 wd Ant WAataant of mach 2h 1¢L¥. Aad wns WTR ASSegdetl A Pe&titrreis ent Tem Judge. [See £xArAET (a),@) and (FJ 3. Appell are Couns o/ WAS I eFFeetiug pred iIncen petertr whe he Earled + INVES HLONTE And BWISE da tines Petirwuas dinect Appel of QLP LT Th xt D&Feacss Cousesel Ua dry Plishoc Ae LAS In EFEeetive whene he Mild & timely : Objet thar he Treat Cowal Iteked Subjece-mattenr Suaisdi Thon +e Chnaegé, Comvwer And Sentence Peuti

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2019-06-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-11
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2019-05-13
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2019-04-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-04-17
Application (18A1061) to file petition for writ of habeas corpus in excess of page limits granted by Justice Sotomayor. The petition for writ of habeas corpus may not exceed 63 pages.
2019-04-04
Application (18A1061) to file petition for writ of habeas corpus in excess of page limits, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
2019-04-04
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.

Attorneys

Samuel Lewis Surles
Samuel Lewis Surles — Petitioner
Samuel Lewis Surles — Petitioner