Whether the 'pipeline' analysis should be expanded to new law that applies to postconviction claims where the resolution of the postconviction claim was still pending when the new case was decided

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Question One: The 'Pipeline’ Analysis Should Be Expanded To New Law That Applies To Postconviction Claims Where The Resolution Of The Postconviction Claim Was , Still Pending When The New Case Was Decided Question Two: Equitable Tolling Should Be Applied When PCR Counsel Fails To Preserve Any Federal AEDPA Time — When Said PCR Counsel Also Represented His Client For Both Direct Appeal And A Motion Alleging Ineffective Assistance Of Trial Counsel Motion Question Three: Equitable Tolling Should Be Applied When PCR Counsel Was Reprimanded And Suspended From the Bar By Their State Supreme Court From The Practice Of Law In Relation To A Clients Case i