No. 18-8888
Nexis Rene Gomez v. Ken Clark, Acting Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-diligence due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel rule-60(b) sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-05-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Ninth Circuit erred in finding that petitioner did not showed that jurist of reason would find it debatable whether the district court abused its discretion in denying the Rule 60(b) motion?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : Did the Ninth Circuit erred in finding that petitioner did not showed that jurist of reason would find it debatable whether the ; district court abused its discretion in denying the Rule 60(b) motion? pid the Ninth Circuit erred in finding that petitioner was. not : : deprived of his constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment? : i ia _
Docket Entries
2019-06-03
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2019.
2019-05-09
Waiver of right of respondent Ken Clark, Acting Warden to respond filed.
2019-03-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 22, 2019)
2019-01-17
Application (18A742) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until March 22, 2019.
2019-01-03
Application (18A742) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 4, 2019 to March 22, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Ken Clark, Acting Warden
Peggy S. Ruffra — California Department of Justice, Respondent
Nexis Rene Gomez
Nexis Rene Gomez — Petitioner