No. 18-8891

Warner Bernard Crider v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-04-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: §-2255 buck-v-davis certificate-of-appealability due-process habeas-corpus merits-review procedural-review sixth-circuit
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-05-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was Crider denied a COA improperly, where the Sixth Circuit's decision is contrary to Buck v. Davis?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Question Presented : Crider Filed Under § 2255 fostering several issues . warranting a certificate of appealability. To Crider's dismay the Sixth Circuit denied all of issues, but looked to far into the merits of his ' issues. This Court has directed the courts of appeals not to rest the decision to deny a COA with reference to the merits. Was Crider denied . a COA improperly, where the Sixth Circuit's decision is contrary to Buck v. Davis? . ~i

Docket Entries

2019-05-20
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.
2019-04-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-11-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 20, 2019)

Attorneys

United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Warner Bernard Crider
Warner Bernard Crider — Petitioner
Warner Bernard Crider — Petitioner