No. 18-8891
Warner Bernard Crider v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: §-2255 buck-v-davis certificate-of-appealability due-process habeas-corpus merits-review procedural-review sixth-circuit
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-05-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was Crider denied a COA improperly, where the Sixth Circuit's decision is contrary to Buck v. Davis?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented : Crider Filed Under § 2255 fostering several issues . warranting a certificate of appealability. To Crider's dismay the Sixth Circuit denied all of issues, but looked to far into the merits of his ' issues. This Court has directed the courts of appeals not to rest the decision to deny a COA with reference to the merits. Was Crider denied . a COA improperly, where the Sixth Circuit's decision is contrary to Buck v. Davis? . ~i
Docket Entries
2019-05-20
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.
2019-04-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-11-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 20, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent