No. 18-8894
Robert L. Mayfield v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: admissibility co-conspirator co-conspirator-statements co-conspirators confrontation-clause criminal-procedure evidence evidence-rule hearsay hearsay-exception out-of-court-statements rule-801 rule-801(d)(2)(e)
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2019-05-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether admission of out-of-court statements made by Robert Mayfield's alleged co-conspirators violated the hearsay exception of Rule 801(d)(2)(E)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented Whether admission of out-of-court statements made by Robert Mayfield’s alleged co-conspirators violated the hearsay exception of Rule 801(d)(2)(E). i
Docket Entries
2019-05-20
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.
2019-04-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-04-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 20, 2019)
Attorneys
Robert Mayfield
John Berry Jr. — Berry Law Firm, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent