No. 18-8898
Melinda J. Campbell v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-law criminal-prosecution economic-harm hobbs-act hobbs-act,economic-harm,criminal-law,mens-rea,prec mens-rea precedent sixth-circuit supreme-court-precedent wrongful-conduct
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-05-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals disregarded this Court's established precedent set forth in United States v. Enmons, 410 U.S. 396 (1973), and whether in a prosecution under the Hobbs Act where economic harm is alleged, the government must prove the defendant knew their conduct was wrongful
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals disregarded this Court’s established precedent set forth in United States v. Enmons, 410 U.S. 396 (1973), and whether in a prosecution under the Hobbs Act where economic harm is alleged, the government must prove the defendant knew their conduct was wrongful. I
Docket Entries
2019-05-20
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.
2019-04-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-04-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 20, 2019)
Attorneys
Melinda Campbell
Mark J. Wettle — Mark Wettle Attorney, Petitioner
Mark J. Wettle — Mark Wettle Attorney, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent