No. 18-890
David D'Addario, et al. v. Virginia A. D'Addario
Tags: circuit-split civil-procedure civil-rico civil-rights due-process hemi-group holmes-v-securities-investor-protection-corp probate proximate-causation rico rico-claims standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a beneficiary of a probate estate can establish the direct injury necessary to bring a civil RICO claim
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1) Whether a beneficiary of a probate estate can establish the direct injury necessary to bring a civil RICO claim when the alleged RICO violation harms the estate as a whole and any impact on beneficiaries of the estate is indirect and derivative. 2) Whether outside parties who are not members of the alleged RICO enterprise can nevertheless be liable under 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) where they are alleged only to have “assisted” or acted as “necessary tools” to a single RICO defendant in his own operation or management of the RICO enterprise.
Docket Entries
2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-02-22
Reply of petitioners David D'Addario, et al. filed.
2019-02-11
Brief of respondent Virginia D'Addario in opposition filed.
2019-01-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 11, 2019)
Attorneys
David D'Addario, et al.
Alfred U. Pavlis — FINN DIXON & HERLING LLP, Petitioner
Virginia D'Addario
F. Dean Armstrong — Attorney at Law, Respondent