Daniel H. Jones v. James F. Goodwin, Judge, Criminal Court for Sullivan County, Tennessee
FifthAmendment DueProcess HabeasCorpus Jurisdiction
Did the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals err in denying the petitioner's absolute right in filing as well as to appeal his civil action in forma pauperis, consistent with 28 USC §1915 (2) & (4)?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW DID THE U.S. SIXTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERR IN DENYING THE . PETITIONER’S ABSOLUTE RIGHT IN FILING AS WELL AS TO APPEAL HIS CIVIL ACTION IN FORMA PAUPERIS, CONSISTENT WITH 28 USC §1915 (2) : & (4)? I. DID THE LOWER APPELLATE COURT | INTERVENE WITH ACTS OF CONGRESS “ AS WELL AS DECISIONS OF THIS U.S. s SUPREME COURT INVOLVING AN ISSUE OF INJUNCTIVE RELIEF WHICH BARS ; SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY? ARE THE U.S. APPELLATE COURTS VESTED WITH UNLIMITED POWER IN RESTORING AN ACCUSED TO HIS/HER RIGHT TO BE HEARD IN A STATE CIRCUIT OF PROPER JURISDICTION & VENUE? 10