No. 18-8901

Daniel H. Jones v. James F. Goodwin, Judge, Criminal Court for Sullivan County, Tennessee

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-04-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: appeals appellate-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights due-process in-forma-pauperis judicial-review sovereign-immunity standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment DueProcess HabeasCorpus Jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2019-11-01 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals err in denying the petitioner's absolute right in filing as well as to appeal his civil action in forma pauperis, consistent with 28 USC §1915 (2) & (4)?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW DID THE U.S. SIXTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERR IN DENYING THE . PETITIONER’S ABSOLUTE RIGHT IN FILING AS WELL AS TO APPEAL HIS CIVIL ACTION IN FORMA PAUPERIS, CONSISTENT WITH 28 USC §1915 (2) : & (4)? I. DID THE LOWER APPELLATE COURT | INTERVENE WITH ACTS OF CONGRESS “ AS WELL AS DECISIONS OF THIS U.S. s SUPREME COURT INVOLVING AN ISSUE OF INJUNCTIVE RELIEF WHICH BARS ; SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY? ARE THE U.S. APPELLATE COURTS VESTED WITH UNLIMITED POWER IN RESTORING AN ACCUSED TO HIS/HER RIGHT TO BE HEARD IN A STATE CIRCUIT OF PROPER JURISDICTION & VENUE? 10

Docket Entries

2019-11-04
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-10-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.
2019-07-02
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-06-24
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.
2019-03-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 20, 2019)

Attorneys

Daniel Jones
Daniel Henderson Jones — Petitioner
Daniel Henderson Jones — Petitioner