No. 18-8904
Octavius Matthews v. Terry Ratliff (TR Motors)
IFP
Tags: appeal appeal-procedure appeals civil-procedure court-dismissal down-payment due-process jurisdiction legal-timeliness plaintiff-claim procedural-grounds standing statute-of-limitations timeliness
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-06-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Why did the courts find that the Appeal was improper, because the plaintiff did not do it right?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Why did the courts find that the Appeal was improper, because the plaintiff did not do it right. 2.Why has the case been erroneous as of it being over a year since the plaintiff gave the defendant a down payment?
Docket Entries
2019-06-24
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.
2019-04-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 20, 2019)