Whether the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on excessive fines applies to asset seizures by state and local governments

Questions Presented Petitioner cites Errors by US Court of Appeals for the Fourth District clear of Eighth Amendment v regarding excessive fines Tyson Timbs v State of Indiana is clear regarding Occurrence and Bad Faith by local and state government and abuse of the Tenth Amendment. Fourteenth Amendment provides for Equal Protection and Due Process without any money after asset seizure how can any person file ; necessary fees to proceed within any local , state, and federal court. Petitioner made publiccomment under Administrative Procedure Act of 1946 Notice, Procedure, Effective Date Asset Seizure undermined ‘ Petitioners ability to Redress under the First Amendment and denied Right to Vote and qualified assembly under DEA, FBI, Homeland Security and other federal components with no “ Social Media” component within the Justice Department under Fourth Amendment person , house, papers and effects denying by default Sixth Amendment protections and criminal discovery abuse operating in bad faith : . even qualifying religion and rights to vote US v Cruikshank and US v Reese . n . ’ . [ ] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. ha Dartics do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of (US. Aven (ovp of Ewes yur § Cad I Aiwood Avene Mar lesdon $0, 94 OS 2. sourh Caro \\wA Hest De Part ment of Healthy ann En Viyow mente | Con arol | abe Mem law Aver CM Ac lagoon S.6 2440S [ ] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. PA parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all